To Lead Through Uncertainty, Unlearn Your Assumptions

Here is an excerpt from an article written by for Harvard Business Review. To read the complete article, check out others, sign up for email alerts, and obtain subscription information, please click here.

Illustration Credit:     Patrick Léger

*  *  *

Leaders are typically promoted for competence in strategy, execution, communication, and influence. But in a more complex world, those strengths are hitting a ceiling. Deloitte’s 2024 Global Human Capital Trends survey of about 14,000 leaders reports that we need to look beyond old performance measures such as efficiency, output, and predictable results. Organizations must now elevate human connection, resilience, adaptability, and imagination, which enable work under uncertainty.

McKinsey describes this shift as an inside out journey that begins with presence rather than more tools, skills, and competencies. It asks leaders to stay available when answers are not yet clear, and to invite others into interpreting what is unfolding. Technical and interpersonal skills remain essential. What differentiates leadership now is the capacity for inner steadiness and shared sensemaking when the path forward is unclear.

Consider Dani, a regional GM I coached from a multinational services firm who was known for getting results without drama. Experienced and steady, Dani aligned functions across markets, managed diverse teams, and translated global strategy into local outcomes. When a midyear global initiative upended budgets and structures, Dani did the right things. He reset priorities. Clarified accountabilities. Held efficient meetings. He created space during one-on-ones for concerns. On paper, his leadership was strong. But momentum still slowed. Longtime colleagues withdrew. Team meetings grew tense. Direct reports clashed. “I am doing all the necessary things,” Dani said, “but it is like everyone is putting their frustrations on me, and I do not know what to do with them anymore.”

Dani’s competence was not the issue. His challenge was the capacity to remain present and show care for his team, while trying to figure out how to navigate the added burdens. What it required was creating space for the team to share that weight instead of holding it together alone. This is the “something else” the research points to—an inner steadiness and shared sensemaking that go beyond traditional skill checklists.

What Capacity Means

Competence is the currency of organizational life. It includes technical strengths such as analysis, strategy, and execution, and interpersonal strengths such as communication, influence, and coaching. Competencies are the hallmark of what competence is called on to be: knowing how to do a set of things well.

Capacity is different. It begins where competence ends. It is how much you can stay present when action will not resolve the tension. It is the extent to which you can hold complexity and tension long enough for meaning to emerge. It is how much you’re able to allow frustration or fear to be spoken and absorb what feels difficult without rushing to closure. Growing this stance asks for unlearning or letting go of assumptions and habits that get in the way, and relearning steadiness and shared meaning making.

What people need first in complex moments is “holding.” As leadership professor Gianpiero Petriglieri describes, holding is the work of thinking with people rather than for them. It’s offering reassurance without pretending to know all the answers. It’s helping others make sense of what is happening. It’s keeping the group together, rather than avoiding difficult conversations and coming up with solutions on your own. In practice, you meet the anxiety, tension, and ambiguity in the room, name it, and help the team interpret it. Capacity is how much of this holding you can sustain.

Leaders grow competence by adding skills, frameworks, and experiences. They grow capacity by unlearning the assumptions that speed, reassurance, and control are necessary when making complex leadership decisions. It requires relearning ways of being that widen the room for reality. Competence equips a leader to manage and organize people so the business runs smoothly. Capacity equips a leader to remain present in the (many) moments when the business and the people in it are unsettled.

How to Grow Capacity

Unlearning is a crucial mechanism of learning. It involves changing prior scripts, not just adding new information. Most leadership development overlooks this and keeps adding skills and frameworks. But the capacity to hold and lead grows by letting go. It is the practice of letting go of assumptions, like equating speed with proof of value, reassurance as progress, or control as safety. As you release those assumptions and behaviors, steadiness, presence and shared holding become more possible. Every practice that follows rests on this shift.

So what does this look like, in practice?

Unlearn the urge to find quick fixes; learn how to take a reflective pause.

Growing your capacity starts with a pause that interrupts the habit of answering quickly to appear decisive. The unlearning is simple and difficult at once: release the assumption that speed equals strength. In the pause, you notice what is actually happening, where the tension is, whose voice is missing, what fear is shaping the room. One minute of quiet after naming a tension signals that the unsolved belongs at the center of the work.

Dani’s meetings were crisp, yet the pressure still remained. A deliberate pause would have told a different story: we will not outrun this issue; we will think together before we move.

Practice saying what you are noticing and then hold sixty seconds of silence. For example, “I notice we keep returning to the same topic, perhaps there’s something more to be explored.” Or, “I’m noticing we’re avoiding making a decision, let’s stay with the hesitation a bit.” The poet John Keats called this negative capability, the willingness to remain in uncertainty without grasping for premature certainty. Quick fixes give the illusion of progress while leaving the real issue unresolved. Naming the tension, then pausing, signals that complexity is something to contend with, and can even feel rewarding, when deeper issues surface.

* * *

Here is a direct link to the complete article.

Annie Peshkam is a lecturer, executive coach and the Director of the Initiative for Learning Innovation and Teaching Excellence (iLITE) at INSEAD. A learning scientist by background, she researches and supports the development of leaders, faculty and organizations drawing on the principles of unlearning and transformational learning.

Posted in

Leave a Comment





This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.