Scaling Automation: Two Proven Paths to Success

Here is an excerpt from an article by and for the MIT Sloan Management Review. To read the complete article, check out others, and obtain subscription information, please click here.

Credit:  Jon Krause/theispot.com  link

* * *

Lessons from two leading hospital systems show how to overcome the obstacles to automation.

Organizations faced with a large volume of repetitive manual processes often look to automation to free up their employees to work on more productive tasks. The challenge, however, is deciding how to implement automation in a way that best suits the organization. Which processes should be prioritized for automation? And should the effort be led by technical experts or process experts? A close look at how two hospital systems adopted automation can provide clues to what approaches might work best for other organizations.

In 2018, the finance department of the Mass General Brigham hospital system in Boston was facing a worsening bottleneck in keeping track of the providers in its network. Front-line employees needed to gather up-to-date information on an increasing number of health care providers, but the process was slow and inefficient, requiring three separate hospital administrators to manually collect, aggregate, and export data through a mind-numbing series of clicks.

* * *

Here is a direct link to the complete article.

1. J. Watson, G. Schaefer, D. Wright, et al., “Automation With Intelligence: Pursuing Organisation-wide Reimagination,” PDF file (Deloitte Insights, 2020), www2.deloitte.com.

2. The scorecards reflect a long-standing framework for evaluating “technology acceptance.” See F.D. Davis, “Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology,” MIS Quarterly 13, no. 3 (September 1989): 319-340.

 

 

Posted in

Leave a Comment





This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.