Facing Disaster After Disaster, the American Red Cross C.E.O. Stays Optimistic

Here is another superb article from for The New York Times in which he shares his conversation with Gail McGovern. To read the complete article, check out others, and obtain information about deep-discount subscriptions, please click here.

Credit:  Andrew Mangum for The New York Times

* * *

When Gail McGovern took over the American Red Cross in 2008, the organization was running a deficit and tarnished by scandal. Annual budget shortfalls ran into the hundreds of millions, and her predecessor was ousted after having an inappropriate relationship with a subordinate.

“We were in deep financial trouble,” she said.

Ms. McGovern, who held executive roles at AT&T and Fidelity before taking a teaching position at Harvard Business School, brought an executive’s eye to the problems she faced.

Bureaucracy was slashed, decision-making was centralized and layoffs thinned the organization’s ranks. The cuts were painful at times, and Ms. McGovern was criticized for putting public relations ahead of relief work.

But after more than a decade on the job, Ms. McGovern is still C.E.O., and the Red Cross is busier than ever.

While the organization is best known for its large-scale relief efforts after natural disasters, it responds to some 60,000 events a year, including mud slides and house fires. This year, wildfires in the West and a succession of hurricanes has strained the organization, which has had to reinvent its disaster-response protocols during the pandemic.

The organization also supplies about 40 percent of the nation’s blood. But those efforts were complicated early on when schools and businesses — where most blood drives take place — were closed

Ms. McGovern said that despite the enormity of the disasters her organization was confronting, she still had hope. “I am the eternal optimist,” she said.

This interview was condensed and edited for clarity.

You were part of the first class of women to attend Johns Hopkins University. What did you take with you from that experience?

It helped me in my career. There were 50 women and 1,900 men. I had a great education there, but what it really also taught me was what it felt like to be the only woman in the room. I don’t remember taking any classes where there were other women. So you learn how to hold your own, because you have no choice.

What did you learn from the corporate world that you’ve been able to apply to your work at the Red Cross?

What is really profoundly different at a nonprofit is that you really have to not only lead with your head, you have to lead with your heart. If you explain the changes you are making through the lens of the mission, people will do anything for you. But they need to know, and understand, how their actions are going to impact the mission.

At AT&T I’d tell people to calm down. “It’s only telecommunications,” I’d say. “We’re not saving lives here. Let’s not panic.” I always was unflappable at Fidelity. “We’re just managing money here,” I’d say. “We’re not saving lives here.” That schtick does not work at the American Red Cross.

But you had to make some painful cuts when you took over.

Part of the reason we had a deficit is there was a lot of duplication. When I walked in the door, there were 720 different chapters, and each chapter had a C.E.O., a local board, their own marketing, their own email platform, their own finances, their own bank accounts, their own treasury, their own purchasing. I had 69 different contracts for T-shirts. So a lot of it was just consolidation and turning to a classic headquarters model. The first year we were able to save $50 million just by managing our purchasing function.

I didn’t hear a lot of complaints about taking all that back-office stuff and centralizing it. We withheld merit increases for a year, and I didn’t hear a peep. We had to do layoffs and I didn’t even hear much squawking about that.

How has the pandemic impacted your ability to operate?

We’re delivering our mission exactly as we should, but the way we’re doing service delivery is different. The first place where we saw the impact of this was in our biomedical organization, which provides 40 percent of the nation’s blood supply. It was kind of stunning how fast that occurred. We watched blood drives start to get canceled rapidly. Schools were closed, businesses were closed. But the team stood up new blood drives in sports arenas and parking lots.

The thing that we needed to do was tell elected officials, “Hey, you’re creating a different health crisis. You need to tell people it’s safe to donate blood.” We went to Larry Hogan, who runs the National Governors Association. He got the word out and boom, people started showing up. But then many hospitals started postponing elective surgery, so now we’re seeing we have a surplus.

* * *

Here is a direct link to the complete interview.

David Gelles writes the Corner Office column and other features for The New York Times’s Sunday Business section, To learn more about him and his work, please click here.

 

Posted in

Leave a Comment





This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.