Frolics and Detours of a Short Hebrew Man: Mel Brooks’s indestructible comedy. 

Here is an excerpt from a classic article written by for The New Yorker (). To read the complete article, check out others, sign up for email alerts, and obtain subscription information, please click here.

Photograph by Jack Mitchell / Getty

* * *

On a warm night in October, 1959, I was bidden to a party at Mamma Leone’s, a restaurant on Forty-eighth Street that was (and is) one of the largest and most popular in Manhattan’s theatre district. Random House had taken it over for the evening to celebrate the publication of “Act One,” the first volume of Moss Hart’s autobiography, which in no way surprised its publishers by turning out to be a best-seller. A further excuse for festivity was the fact that the author’s fifty-fifth birthday was to take place the following day. By any standards, the guest list—some two hundred strong—was fairly eye-catching. In addition to a favored bunch of critics and columnists, it included a representative selection of the show-business celebrities then in New York, among them Claudette Colbert, John Gielgud, Sam Goldwyn, Margaret Leighton, Ed Sullivan, Alan Jay Lerner, Yves Montand, Simone Signoret, Ethel Merman, Alec Guinness, Truman Capote, Rosalind Russell, and Marlene Dietrich—at which point my memory gives out. A group of Moss Hart’s admirers had put together an entertainment in his honor, and this was already under way when I arrived. Betty Comden and Adolph Green were just finishing a routine that satirized some of the more disastrous ways in which “Act One” might be adapted for the screen. During the applause I was burrowing through the resplendent mob, and, like many of my fellow-guests, I failed to catch the names of the next performers when they were introduced by the master of ceremonies, Phil Silvers.

Peering over the heads of a hundred or so standees, in front of whom other spectators sat, squatted, or sprawled, I saw two men in business suits. One, tall and lean, was conducting an interview with the other, who was short and compact. Their faces were among the few in the room which were not instantly recognizable. Though I took no notes, I recall much of what they said, and the waves of laughter that broke over it, and the wonder with which I realized that every word of it was improvised. The tall man was suave but relentlessly probing, the stubby one urgent and eager in response, though capable of outrage when faced with questions he regarded as offensive. Here, having been shaken in the sieve of nineteen years, is what my memory retains:

Q.: I gather, sir, that you are a famous psychoanalyst?

A.: That is correct.

Q.: May I ask where you studied psychiatry?

A.: At the Vienna School of Good Luck.

Q.: Who analyzed you?

A.: I was analyzed by No. 1 himself.

Q.: You mean the great Sigmund Freud?

A.: In person. Took me during lunchtime, charged me a nickel.

Q.: What kind of man was he?

A.: Lovely little fellow. I shall never forget the hours we spent together, me lying on the couch, him sitting right there beside me, wearing a nice off-the-shoulder dress.

Q.: Is it true, sir, that Mr. Moss Hart is one of your patients?

A.: That is also correct. [As everyone present knew, Moss Hart had been in analysis for many years, and made no secret of the benefits he had derived from it.]

Q.: Could you tell us, sir, what Mr. Hart talks about during your analytic sessions?

A.: He talks smut. He talks dirty, he talks filthy, he talks pure, unadulterated smut. It makes me want to puke.

Q.: How do you cope with this?

A.: I wash his mouth out with soap. I tell him, “Don’t talk dirty, don’t say those things.”

Q.: What are Mr. Hart’s major problems? Does he have an Oedipus complex?

A.: What is that?

Q.: You’re an analyst, sir, and you never heard of an Oedipus complex?

A.: Never in my life.

Q.: Well, sir, it’s when a man has a passionate desire to make love to his own mother.

A. [after a pause]: That’s the dirtiest thing I ever heard. Where do you get that filth?

Q.: It comes from a famous play by Sophocles.

A.: Was he Jewish?

Q.: No, sir, he was Greek.

A.: With a Greek, who knows? But, with a Jew, you don’t do a thing like that even to your wife, let alone your mother.

Q.: But, sir, according to Freud, every man has this intense sexual attachment to his—

A.: Wait a minute, wait a minute, whoa, gee-haw, just hold your horses right there. Moss Hart is a nice Jewish boy. Maybe on a Saturday night he takes the mother to the movies, maybe on the way home he gives her a little peck in the back of the cab, but going to bed with the mother—get out of here! What kind of smut is that?

Q.: During your sessions with Mr. Hart, does he ever become emotionally overwrought?

A.: Very frequently, and it’s a degrading spectacle.

Q.: How do you handle these situations ?

A.: I walk straight out of the room, I climb up a stepladder, and I toss in aspirins through the transom.

When they stopped, after about a quarter of an hour, the cabaret ended, and that was just as well, for nobody could have followed them. A crowd of professional entertainers erupted in cheers. The idea of a puritanical analyst was a masterstroke of paradox, and the execution had matched the concept in brilliance. Moss Hart was heard to say that the act was the funniest fourteen minutes he could remember. The room buzzed with comment, yet hardly anyone seemed to know who the little maestro was. Diligent quizzing revealed that he was a thirty-three-year-old television writer, that he had spent most of the preceding ten years turning out sketches for Sid Caesar, and that his name was Mel Brooks. I later discovered that his interrogator was Mel Tolkin, another, and a senior, member of the renowned menagerie of authors whose scripts, as interpreted by Caesar, Imogene Coca, and a talented supporting cast, had made “Your Show of Shows” a golden landmark in the wasteland of television comedy. Tolkin (a harassed-looking man, once compared by Brooks to “a stork that dropped a baby and broke it and is coming to explain to the parents”) was standing in at the party for Carl Reiner, a gifted performer who had also been part of the Caesarean operation. Ever since Brooks and Reiner met, in 1950, they had been convulsing their friends with impromptu duologues. The Moss Hart jamboree was an important show-business event, and, the press being present in force, it would have marked their semi-public début. Unfortunately, Reiner had a TV job in Los Angeles and could not make the date; hence his replacement by Tolkin, who had performed with Brooks on several previous occasions, though never in front of such a daunting audience. I knew nothing of this at the time; Tolkin struck me as a first-rate straight man. All I knew as I left Mamma Leone’s that night was that his stubby, pseudo-Freudian partner was the most original comic improviser I had ever seen.

* * *

Here is a direct link to the complete article.

Kenneth Tynan (1927–1980) lived one of the most intriguing theater lives of his century. A brilliant writer, critic, and agent provocateur, he made friends or enemies of nearly every major actor, playwright, impresario, and movie mogul of the 1950s, ‘60s, and ‘70s. He wrote for the Evening Standard, the Observer, and the New Yorker; served eleven years as dramaturg for Britain’s newly formed National Theatre, and spent his final years in Los Angeles. He made numerous and powerful contribution to post-war British theater, set against the context of the fifties, sixties, and seventies and his own turbulent life.

 

Posted in

Leave a Comment





This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.